Page 1 of 1

Unseen x"

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 6:17 am
by cwesterman13
Having CTRL-F'd the rulebook pdf several times to find this rule; without success, the closest i've found is this:

Warriors that are partially seen are still seen but only if the
sighting warrior is within a certain distance of them.
Sometimes a rule or effect can impose this, but more often
than not it is terrain that ensures warriors can only be seen
within a certain distance.
This will be noted, either on a warrior's profile (or via a rule
or effect) as seen n”, meaning that a partially seen warrior has
a seen length of n” - i.e., he can only be seen if the sighting
warrior is within n inches from his base.

Can Unseen x" (Specifically Unseen 6") therefore be assumed to be the reverse - that the warrior is unseen if the (would-be) sighting warrior is within 6"?

Re: Unseen x"

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 1:33 pm
by Rob Lane
Did you look in the index?

P126 explains it all.

Cheers
Rob

Re: Unseen x"

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 4:21 pm
by cwesterman13
Rob Lane wrote:Did you look in the index?

P126 explains it all.

Cheers
Rob


Page 126 defines unseen; but nothing about unseen x" - there is no frame of reference for unseen to have a distance-based qualifier; only for seen to have one

Re: Unseen x"

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 4:42 pm
by Rob Lane
cwesterman13 wrote:
Rob Lane wrote:Did you look in the index?

P126 explains it all.

Cheers
Rob


Page 126 defines unseen; but nothing about unseen x" - there is no frame of reference for unseen to have a distance-based qualifier; only for seen to have one


Ah yes of course, it should be seen x", not unseen x" - I'll change that on the profiles; although unseen still fits the bill for artefacts that make people invisible.

Cheers
Rob

Re: Unseen x"

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 4:43 pm
by cwesterman13
Rob Lane wrote:
cwesterman13 wrote:
Rob Lane wrote:Did you look in the index?

P126 explains it all.

Cheers
Rob


Page 126 defines unseen; but nothing about unseen x" - there is no frame of reference for unseen to have a distance-based qualifier; only for seen to have one


Ah yes of course, it should be seen x", not unseen x" - I'll change that on the profiles.

Cheers
Rob


Thanks, the one that inspired the question is Cadwaladr, if that helps

Re: Unseen x"

Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 4:45 pm
by Rob Lane
cwesterman13 wrote:Thanks, the one that inspired the question is Cadwaladr, if that helps


Yeah, that would be seen 6" in his case.

Keep up the good work here!

Cheers
Rob