Having CTRL-F'd the rulebook pdf several times to find this rule; without success, the closest i've found is this:
Warriors that are partially seen are still seen but only if the
sighting warrior is within a certain distance of them.
Sometimes a rule or effect can impose this, but more often
than not it is terrain that ensures warriors can only be seen
within a certain distance.
This will be noted, either on a warrior's profile (or via a rule
or effect) as seen n”, meaning that a partially seen warrior has
a seen length of n” - i.e., he can only be seen if the sighting
warrior is within n inches from his base.
Can Unseen x" (Specifically Unseen 6") therefore be assumed to be the reverse - that the warrior is unseen if the (would-be) sighting warrior is within 6"?
Unseen x"
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2019 3:02 am
- Rob Lane
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:46 pm
- Location: Warsop Vale, Nottinghamshire
- Contact:
Re: Unseen x"
Did you look in the index?
P126 explains it all.
Cheers
Rob
P126 explains it all.
Cheers
Rob
Mierce Miniatures
https://mierce-miniatures.com
https://mierce-miniatures.com
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2019 3:02 am
Re: Unseen x"
Rob Lane wrote:Did you look in the index?
P126 explains it all.
Cheers
Rob
Page 126 defines unseen; but nothing about unseen x" - there is no frame of reference for unseen to have a distance-based qualifier; only for seen to have one
- Rob Lane
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:46 pm
- Location: Warsop Vale, Nottinghamshire
- Contact:
Re: Unseen x"
cwesterman13 wrote:Rob Lane wrote:Did you look in the index?
P126 explains it all.
Cheers
Rob
Page 126 defines unseen; but nothing about unseen x" - there is no frame of reference for unseen to have a distance-based qualifier; only for seen to have one
Ah yes of course, it should be seen x", not unseen x" - I'll change that on the profiles; although unseen still fits the bill for artefacts that make people invisible.
Cheers
Rob
Mierce Miniatures
https://mierce-miniatures.com
https://mierce-miniatures.com
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2019 3:02 am
Re: Unseen x"
Rob Lane wrote:cwesterman13 wrote:Rob Lane wrote:Did you look in the index?
P126 explains it all.
Cheers
Rob
Page 126 defines unseen; but nothing about unseen x" - there is no frame of reference for unseen to have a distance-based qualifier; only for seen to have one
Ah yes of course, it should be seen x", not unseen x" - I'll change that on the profiles.
Cheers
Rob
Thanks, the one that inspired the question is Cadwaladr, if that helps
- Rob Lane
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:46 pm
- Location: Warsop Vale, Nottinghamshire
- Contact:
Re: Unseen x"
cwesterman13 wrote:Thanks, the one that inspired the question is Cadwaladr, if that helps
Yeah, that would be seen 6" in his case.
Keep up the good work here!
Cheers
Rob
Mierce Miniatures
https://mierce-miniatures.com
https://mierce-miniatures.com
Return to “Darklands Rules and Musters - Updates, Errata and Addenda”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests